Running head: NARCISSISTIC PERSONALITY DISORDER
Types of Crimes: The Relationship Between Narcissistic and Antisocial Personalities
Abbey Sereno
Saint Bonaventure University
Abstract
The essential feature of a narcissistic personality is a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy (APA, 1994). Crime is, “an act in violation of law that causes harm, is identified by law, is committed with criminal intent, and is subject to punishment” (Adler, Mueller, & Lauger, 2001). The most vital characteristic of Antisocial Personality Disorder is, “a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood” (APA, 1994). The Unified Crime Report has divided offenses into two categories which include Part I offenses and Part II offenses (Adler et al., 2001). Part I offenses, or Index crimes, are defined as crimes committed against a person such as rape, or those crimes committed against property such as arson (Adler et al., 2001). Part II offenses are considered those crimes that do not fall within the two categories of Part I offenses and include weapon offenses and vandalism. The personality characteristics are different for Part one and Part two offenses. 2x2x2 factorial design
Types of Crimes: The Relationship Between Narcissistic and Antisocial Personalities
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 4th edition (DSM-IV; APA, 1994), “The essential feature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a pervasive pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of empathy that begins by early adulthood and is present in a variety of contexts.” Individuals diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder demonstrate signs of extreme self-involvement, and lack of interest in and empathy for others (McNeal, 2003). Certain criteria were developed by Freud for the clinical use of the word narcissism (Raskin & Terry, 1988). Self-admiration, vulnerabilities relating to self-esteem, defensiveness, drive for perfection, and feelings of entitlement are among the many behavioral occurrences Freud documented (Raskin et al., 1988).
A
narcissistic individual’s vulnerable self-esteem opens him or her up to distress
from criticism or defeat (APA, 1994).
For this reason these individuals may react in an outrage or defiant
counterattack. Other personality
disorders have been found to be associated with Narcissistic Personality
Disorder including Borderline, Antisocial and Paranoid Personality Disorders
(also known as Cluster B personality disorders) (APA, 1994).
Research conducted by Bernard and Proulx (2002) shows that narcissistic offenders seek out power or status while trying to eliminate competition during their criminal activities. This study also shows the narcissistic offenders are more likely to resist arrest when caught and tend to deny any use of violence (Bernard & Proulx, 2002). The quest for power and prestige is consistent with the diagnostic criteria presented by the DSM-IV (APA, 1994). Narcissistic individuals expect to be catered to and when this demand is not meet he or she may become furious potentially resulting in a criminal act (APA, 1994).
Antisocial Personality Disorder is one of the Cluster B personalities that have been involved in extensive research on a variety of topics. The most vital characteristic of Antisocial Personality Disorder is, “a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others that begins in childhood or early adolescence and continues into adulthood” (APA, 1994). Individuals diagnosed with an antisocial personality often fail to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors resulting in repeated acts that result in his or her arrest. These individuals tend to be deceitful and display disregard for the safety of themselves or others (APA, 1994). The lack of remorse they exhibit is often coupled with their consistent irresponsibility and impulsivity. Antisocial personalities have also been known to be irritable and aggressive (APA, 1994).
There has been a lot of research combining Antisocial Personality Disorder and crime and violence. One such study sought to better understand the relationship between mental disorders and violence (Warren et al., 2002). Positive relationships were found between Antisocial Personality Disorder and institutional violence. Past research has found that female felons tend to have higher rates of Antisocial Personality Disorder as well as other disorders and dependencies (Warren et al., 2002). A similar study dealing with incarcerated violent male offenders was able to identify six diagnostic patterns including: “antisocial-narcissistic, paranoid-antisocial, borderline-antisocial-passive-aggressive, borderline, compulsive-borderline and schizoid” (Warren et al., 2002).
A study done by Geberth and Turco (1997) examined the crime scene behaviors of serial murders. Results identified styles and patterns in their killings that involved domination, control and humiliation and the murders were committed with little guilt or shame and total lack of remorse (Geberth & Turco, 1997). These are common characteristics found in antisocial personalities. This and other research of this nature has studies primarily convicted serial offenders (murders, rapists, arsonist ect.) and therefore this study examines similar topics using a university population.
Although Narcissistic Personality Disorder and Antisocial Personality Disorder have commonalities in behavioral characteristics, individuals with antisocial personalities are more impulsive, aggressive, and deceitful then narcissistic individuals (APA, 1994).
Crime has been defined in many ways by different theorists throughout time. Crime is, “an act in violation of law that causes harm, is identified by law, is committed with criminal intent, and is subject to punishment” (Adler, Mueller, & Lauger, 2001). Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime, or Self-Control Theory, is the basis for the connection between criminal behavior and narcissism (William & McShane, 1999). The theory identifies individuals who commit crimes have certain traits, among them impulsivity, insensitivity, self-centeredness, and lower then average intelligence. The act of committing a crime contains attractiveness that is seen to entice those individuals who have a tendency to commit crime due to the promise of pleasure (Williams & McShane, 1999). Individuals diagnosed with Narcissistic Personality Disorder show common characteristics as those individuals Gottfredson and Hirschi describe as likely to engage in criminal activity. The insensitivity and self-centeredness of those individuals likely to commit crimes are common traits seen in narcissistic and antisocial individuals.
The Unified Crime Report has divided offenses into two categories which include Part I offenses and Part II offenses (Adler, Mueller, & Laufer, 2001). Part I offenses, or Index crimes, are defined as crimes committed against the person and include: criminal homicide, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault) or those crimes committed against property and include: burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson (Adler et al., 2001). Part II offenses are considered those crimes that do not fall within the two categories of the Part I offenses. Part II offenses include: fraud, embezzlement, weapon offenses, and vandalism but exclude any traffic violations. Due to the seriousness of Index crimes, they are more readily reported to authorities and therefore more often used in research (Adler et al., 2001).
It is believed, due to the nature of an antisocial personality, those individuals high in antisocial personalities are more likely to commit crimes. It is predicted that those individuals high in both antisocial and narcissistic personalities are more likely to commit part one offenses. It is also believed that those individuals who are high in narcissistic personalities and low in antisocial personalities will commit fewer crimes overall, with the majority of the offenses committed being part two.
Methods
Participants and Procedure
One-hundred college age students served as participants (N=100). The sample of students was recruited from Saint Bonaventure University. The participants ranged in age from seventeen to twenty-three and were of various ethnicities. All participants were administered the forty item NPI to assess from degree of Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Participants were also given a list of crimes and asked to check all the crimes they had committed, not necessarily been caught for. At the duration of the study all participating students received extra credit in various courses. The amount of extra credit was determined by the individual professors.
Materials
The Measurement of Narcissistic Personality
The forty item NPI was administered in order to obtain scores for all seven components of the inventory. Justification for the use of the NPI was found in several validation studies previously done (Emmons, 1984; Raskin et al., 1988; Watson et al., 1984). Emmons (1984) did a study comparing his four factor version of the NPI (Raskin et al., 1979) with other personality tests (Emmons, 1984).
A
similar study was done the same year by Watson and his colleagues (1984)
concerned with narcissism and empathy.
The study compared the NPI (Raskin et al., 1979) with the NPDS in
attempts to demonstrate the validity of the NPI (Watson et al., 1984). This study explored the construct validity of
the Narcissistic Personality Inventory by looking at correlations between it
and questionnaire measures of empathy.
The hypothesis and construct validity was supported (Watson et al.,
1984).
There have been several attempts to develop a measurement to accurately assess narcissism. The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) and the Rorschach Inkblot Test were explored (Emmons, 1984). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) will be used to assess narcissistic traits and to explore the envy, arrogance, explosiveness and sense of entitlement associated with it (Raskin & Hall, 1981; Watson, Sawrie, Greene, & Arredondo, 2002). The NPI was designed by Raskin and Hall (1979) to measure individual differences in narcissism (Emmons, 1987). The questionnaire consisted of fifty-four items derived from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-III) criteria for narcissistic personality disorder (Emmons, 1987; Emmons, 1984). The seven components of Raskin and Hall’s scale are: Authority, Exhibitionism, Superiority, Entitlement, Exploitativeness, Self-Sufficiency, and Vanity (Raskin et al., 1979).
A scale developed by Raskin and Terry (1988) was used to determine the levels of narcissism for participating individuals. Raskin and Terry (1988) developed mean averages for the Narcissistic Personality Inventory scores based on gender by administering the NPI to over a thousand individuals. Using this mean, a male scoring above 16.5 is considered high in narcissism and a male scoring below 16.5 is considered low in narcissism. Females scoring above 14.72 are said to be high in narcissism and those females scoring below 14.72 are considered low in narcissism (Raskin & Terry, 1988).
Measurement of Antisocial Personality
The
Antisocial Personality Questionnaire (APQ) was given to all participants to
assess for levels of Antisocial Personality.
The 125-item, self-report inventory that measures eight primary traits
and two higher order dimensions of Antisocial Personality. The eight primary traits include:
self-control, self-esteem, avoidance, paranoid suspicion, resentment, aggression,
deviance, and extraversion (
Measurement of Crime
All participants were asked to complete a checklist of crimes they have committed, but not necessarily caught for (Table 2). The crimes they check will then be broken into Part one and Part two offenses in order to see which are more likely committed by narcissistic individuals. A list of total number of crimes committed by each individual will also be compiled in order to assess for the number of crimes committed by individuals high and low in narcissism.
Results
The results found are consistent with previous personality and crime research. The data was analyzed with a 2 x 2 x 2 (Level of Narcissistic Personality x Level of Antisocial Personality x Type of Crime) between subject ANOVA (Figure 1). Results indicate a significant three-way interaction (Level of Narcissistic Personality x Level of Antisocial Personality x Type of Crime), F (1,72) = 71.17, p< .0001. A main effect was found for Narcissism such that F (1,72) = 71.17, p<.001. A main effect was also found for Antisocial such that F (1,72) = 32.24, p<.001.
Discussion
The results of this experiment indicate a relationship between Narcissistic and Antisocial Personalities when dealing with types of crimes committed. In other words, narcissism and antisocial depend on the types of crimes committed. The hypothesis was supported in that the presence of both Narcissistic and Antisocial Personalities predict
more part one crimes being committed.
Results also confirm that those individuals high in Antisocial Personality are more likely to commit crimes regardless of the type. These results are consistent with the findings of Warren and his colleagues (2002). Warren et al. (2002) found Antisocial Personalities to be common among incarcerated female offenders.
It was also found that although the levels of antisocial vary between types of crimes, there is a high level of narcissism common to both part one and part two offenses.
Table 1
|
Source
|
df |
F |
P |
|
Narcissism
|
1 |
71.17 |
0.001 |
|
Antisocial
|
1 |
32.24 |
0.001 |
|
Crime |
1 |
210.64 |
0.001 |
|
Narcissism
* Antisocial |
1 |
1.87 |
0.001 |
|
Narcissism
* Crime |
1 |
22.37 |
0.001 |
|
Antisocial
* Crime |
1 |
87.26 |
0.001 |
|
Narcissism
* Antisocial * Crime |
1 |
58.03 |
0.001 |
Figure 1. Mean of Offenses for Part Two Offenses
Figure 2. Mean of Offenses for Part Two Offenses
Table 2
Criminal Activities Checklist
Instructions: Indicate, on the line provided, the number of times you
have participated in each of the listed activities.
- Paid for something with a check when
you knew there was not enough money in ______
your account to cover it.
- Received property that you knew was stolen ______
- Forcibly had sex with another individual
without his or her consent ______
- Damaged or destroyed someone else’s property ______
- Sold firearms without having a license to do so ______
- Printed counterfeit money ______
- Broke into a building or residence with the ______
intent to take something that was not yours
- Attempted to cause bodily injury to someone ______
- Taken or borrowed cable without paying for it ______
- Intentionally, knowingly, recklessly, or
negligently caused death to another human being ______
- Carried or used and unregistered weapon ______
- Provided a false form of identification ______
- Taken something from a store without paying for it ______
- Took a car, without the owners permission ______
- Threatened to hurt someone ______
References
Adler, F., Mueller, G. O. W., &
Laufer, W. S. (2001). Criminology and the Criminal Justice System. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.,
Bernard, G. & Proulx, J. (2002). Characteristics of Actions of Borderline Violent and Narcissistic Offenders. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 51-75.
Coulter, T. (2001). Defensive Self-Esteem, Trait Anger, and Anger Reactivity. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 61, 6174.
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (4th ed).
American Psychiatric Association.;
1994
Emmons, R. A.
(1987). Narcissism: Theory and
Measurement. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 52, 11-17.
Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor Analysis and Construct Validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 3.
Geberth, V. J.
& Turco, R. N. (1997). Antisocial
Personality Disorder, Sexual Sadism, Malignant
Narcissism, and Serial Murders. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 42, 49- 60.
Kernberg, O. F.
(1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism.
McNeal, S.
(2003). A Character in Search of
Character: Narcissistic Personality Disorder
and
Raskin, R. &
Hall, C. S. (1979). A Narcissistic
Personality Inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590.
Raskin, R. & Hall, C.S. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate Form Reliability and Further Evidence of Construct Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159-162.
Raskin, R.,
Novacek, J., & Hogen, R. (1991).
Narcissism, Self-Esteem, and Defensive Self-Enhancement. Journal
of Personality, 59, 19-38.
Raskin, R. & Terry, H. (1988). A Principle-Components Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and Further Evidence of Its Construct Validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890-902.
Rathvon, N. & Holmstrom, R. W. (1996). An MMPI-2 Portrait of Narcissism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 1-19.
Watson, P. J.,
Grisham, S. O., Trotter, M. V. & Biderman, M. D. (1984). Narcissism and Empathy: Validity Evidence for the Narcissistic Personality
Inventory. Journal of Personality
Assessment, 45, 3.
Watson, P.J., Sawrie, S. M., Greene, R. L. & Arredondo, R. (2002). Narcissism and Depression : MMPI-2 Evidence for the Continuum Hypothesis in Clinical Samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 79, 85.
Williams, F. P. & McShane, M.
D. (1999). Criminological Theory (3rd ed). Prentice Hall
Inc.,