10@222

Derivatives of Classical Conditioning

1)Sensory Preconditioning

 

 Control Group                            Experimental Group

Phase

1.       SPC Phase                 CS1(light) > CS2 (tone)                CS1(light) > CS2 (tone)

2.       Conditioning Phase                    CS2 (tone) > UCS (shock)            CS2 (tone) > no UCS

3.       Testing Phase               CS1 alone

Hope for no CR to CS1      Hope for CR too CS1

----------------------------------- Every day example

2). Higher Order Conditioning

               Control Group                         Experimental

1) Conditioning CS1(Light) > No UCS    CS1 (light) > UCS (shock)

2) HOC CS2 (tone) > CS1 (light)  CS2 (tone)>CS1 (light)

3) Test     CS2 alone/pray for no CR  CS2 alone/hope for CR

                 tone #no fear                      tone>fear

Everyday examples

 

 

Sensory Preconditioning

CS’s paired before US is introduced

Procedure 

Phase 1 CS1 à CS2

Phase 2 CS1 à US

Test CS2 (see CR)

Second-order conditioning

Procedure

CS1 à US

CS2 à CS1

test CS2

e.g. odor aversion in snails

 

e.g. fear in lab monkeys of snake

http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/~mbell/psy103outline3.html

Applications of Classical Conditioning

 

     Watson & Rayner (1921): Little Albert

     Systematic Desensitization

          Fear Heirarchy

          Progressive Relaxation (Deep Muscle Relaxation)

     Flooding, Implosion

     Alcohol-Aversion Therapy (Voegtline & Lemere (1950’s))

 

     Rapid Smoking Technique

     Pedophiles

     Chemotherapy/radiation & food

     pooping

     enuresis

     Reflex epilepsy

     Phobia treatment

     Morphine (Siegal)

     Preparedness/belongingness (Garcia)

          but compare Garcia’s results and conclusions to Krane & Wagner

          (1975) and Willner (1978)

 

 

 

 

Rescorla-Wagner model of classical conditioning is a mathematical model of classical

conditioning, a model of surprise: "…learning will occur only when the subject is

surprised…" (p. 89)

 

 six rules (Mazur, p. 89)

 

   1.If the strength of the actual US is greater than the strength of the subject’s

     expectation, all CSs that were paired with the US will receive excitatory

     conditioning.

   2.If the strength of the actual US is less than the strength of the subject’s

     expectation, all the CSs that were paired with the US will receive some inhibitory

     conditioning

   3.If the strength of the actual US is equal to the strength of the subject’s

     expectation, there will be no conditioning

   4.The larger the discrepancy between the strength of the expectation and the

     strength of the US, the greater will be the conditioning (either excitatory or

     inhibitory) that occurs

   5.More salient (more noticeable) CSs will condition faster than less salient (less

     noticeable) CSs.

   6.If two or more CSs are presented together, the subject’s expectation will be equal

     to their total strength (with excitatory and inhibitory stimuli tending to cancel each

     other out).