I.
Monday
2002:A CR WITHOUT A CS-UCS PAIRING? 1)Derivative of Pavlovian
Preconditioning (SPC) & Conditioning: Sensory Higher Order Conditioning
(HOC) |
1) SPC:
SENSORY PRE-CONDITIONING |
Rizley
& Rescorla (1972) |
Control Group Experimental
Group
1) Phase SPC Phase
1.
CS1(light) > CS2
(tone) CS1(light) >
CS2 (tone)
2) Conditioning Phase
2.
CS2 (tone) > no UCS CS2 (tone) > UCS
(shock)
3.
Testing Phase CS1 alone
Hope for no CR to CS1 Hope for CR too CS1 |
2
----------------------------- Every day examples:
Buffalo and TV Rod and Mike. Think of one event and
reminds of another. Events always occur together and when you hear or see or Smell the other, the first
one comes to mind. Twins. Sensory Preconditioning. We oftentimes associate stimuli long before we know anything about them. Then, once we learn something about one of them, we will have a tendency to respond to the other in a similar way. For example, in the laboratory, a tone and light may be repeatedly presented together to a hungry dog. However, neither stimulus is one that will evoke much of a response from the dog, so the pairing produces little responsiveness. Then, though, lets say we repeatedly pair the light with the presentation of food. Eventually, the dog will salivate to the presentation of the light alone, showing Pavlovian conditioning. What will happen if we now present the tone to the dog? Tone has been paired with light, but at a time when light was trivial to the dog. The tone has never been paired with food, yet the dog will salivate when the tone is presented, showing sensory preconditioning |
|
|
3 2). Higher
Order Conditioning HIGHER
ORDER CONDITIONING When an existing conditional
reflex acts as the basis for producing another reflex, higher-order conditioning is said to
occur. Control
Group
Experimental 1) Conditioning CS1(Light) > No UCS CS1 (light) > UCS (shock) 2) HOC CS2
(tone) > CS1 (light) CS2
(tone)>CS1 (light) 3) Test CS2 alone/pray for no CR
CS2 alone/hope for CR tone #no
fear
tone>fear |
|
|
CS (Dining room) +US Food |
==> |
UR desire to
eat |
CS (Dining room)+room smell Room smell >>>
hunger 4 |
==> |
CR desire to |
Higher-order conditioning. Not
all Pavlovian conditioning involves the presence of an inborn reflex. Much of
our conditioning occurs when a new stimulus is paired with an existing
conditional reflex, thereby producing another reflex. When an existing
conditional reflex acts as the basis for yet another reflex, higher-order
conditioning is said to occur An exercise that illustrates this principle
repeats one of the Staats’ earlier studies. The instructor presents a list of
nonsense syllables paired with positive words such as “baby” or negative words
such as “slime.” Later, students evaluate the nonsense syllables on a good-bad
dimension. Those syllables paired with negative words are apt to get more negative
evaluations than those paired with positive words.
5
For example, if I showed you a film of a
dentist drilling away on a computer. With headphones. , you may feel
uncomfortable next time you see the computer where you were working when you
heard the drill. You may particularly focus on the headphones that you were
wearing when the drilling sound started. That would be Higher Order
conditioning, since the computer/headphones and actual drillingpain
have never been associated, only the conditioned stimulus of the sound of
drilling and the computer/headphones.
• How might certain groups become paired with positive or negative descriptions?
• Where in the community might this occur?
Pavlovian Conditioning Paper
and Presentation
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
http://www-psy.ucsd.edu/~mbell/psy103outline3.html