25@222

I.                           Possible misuses of positive reinforcement: Punished By Rewards:

Punished By Rewards:

                     The Trouble with Gold

                     Stars, Incentive Plans,

                     A's, Praise, and Other

                     Bribes

A. Conditioned bribery

B. Conditioned greed

C. Undermining Intrinsic Motivation

D. Aversiveness of being controlled

E. Aversiveness of not being in control

 

Page 2

Can  you think of situations where objections to the use of rewards might also be scrutinized and negatively evaluated. Misuses.

SUSPICION: Movement toward cognition

Adverse effects of tangible rewards:

1) concrete reinforces as bribery (quid pro quo conditioning)

but isn't how the real world operates, paychecks etc.merit raises, it does have immoral connotations/ should you  reinforce for requirements of daily living: responsibility, moral choice, kindness. wearing your retainer.)

2) teaches greed: 20.00 bucks to clean room generalizes to I am not going to engage in any behavior unless there is some tangible

 

 

 

reward given. Use mild reinforces like social praise.Rat will stop bar pressing to receive 2 pellets if you give it 6 pellets. Insist on getting more the next time.

 

3) be leery of administering non-contingent rewards; spoiled brat

4) Be sensitive to the possibility of undermining intrinsic motivation;

Devalue the activity;

Sometime offering a reward for a task is a subtle statement suggesting the task is not worth it, or certainly not worth doing for its own sake. Social praise wins out over tangible rewards.

Leeper, Greene, and Nisbett (1973) Drawing pictures and reinforcement.

Phase 1. assess spontaneous level of picture drawing base rate

 

Page 3

Provide class with felt pens, paper, etc

Phase 2. A visitor is coming who would like to see the kind s of pictures you have been drawing

R group good drawer reward, trinkets, etc. and told to expect reward

UR unexpected reward

NR just keep drawing without reward

R does not = base whereas UR and no reward = base

Results and back to base rate and found that control = base line but experimental cut to half time of base.

5) aversiveness of being controlled helplessness and

control

Glass and Feldman told working on experiment dealing with stress on performance

proof read manuscript and trace drawing while an aversive tone blared                     

Half given button to push to terminate, and other .5.contingent group performed better on drawing and proof. Stress reduced by control and hence better performance. Control is good but the perception of control is critical. Ryan and puzzle task:

group 1 good

group 2 you are doing as good as you should interest in task lower

Act your age,

Tangible reinforcement use: unattractive task  using principle of minimal force use least powerful reinforcement to be effective.

Behavioral contracts and control.

Parents and kids sit around the table and discuss what they want form each other. What do you want form me instead of this is what I want you to do

Best alternative to reinforcement is modeling and imitation.

Alfie Kohn, in his book Punished by Rewards, uses extensive

                     documentation to support his conclusion that behaviorism is an

                     ineffective tool when dealing with people, whether employees,

                     students, or children. He argues that the using the carrot method of "do

                     this and you'll get that" leads to extrinsic motivation, where the reward

                     is obtained by any means. This leads to less intrinsic motivation and

 

Page 4

                     people ultimate lose interest or care about the quality of work, or

                     amount of learning achieved. He seems to want to over-turn the

                     mainstream theory that the only way to achieve success is by one

                     person over-powering another through their authority and bribes.

                     Current beliefs in education include: teacher-centered classrooms,

                     behavior-management programs, and learning achieved through bribes

                     and grades. Mr. Kohn wishes to completely change this method of

                     thinking, and instead create a "3C" classroom, with: collaboration,

                     content, and choice. These classrooms eliminate rewards as the basis

                     for learning, and instead create classrooms where kids want to learn

                     for the sake of knowledge itself. The teachers and students work

                     together, often through cooperative learning groups, to obtain

                     knowledge and understanding relevant and interesting to the students n

                     their day-to-day lives.

 

                     I think that Mr. Kohn's theory was well researched, explained, and is

                     believable. He clearly explains the basic problem existing throughout

                     American society with the use of rewards. As a future teacher,

                     thinking about ideas to use in the classroom, I am eager to try his

                     methods with "kids today." I would definitely recommend this book to

                     anyone dealing with kids, who wants them to start caring about each

                     other, or the material they are learning, rather than just doing the ork

                     to get the "A" and then forgetting about it. I support his assessment of

                     education strategies today, especially the honors students on the

                     "fast-track" to college. Having just graduated with such a group, I

                     know all about the all-night crams, cheating, copying, and generally

                     doing anything besides learning the material to obtain the grade.

                     Although I agree with the problem he addresses, I wonder if his

                     solution of a school without grades is feasible. He does not require this

                     as part of his "formula for success," merely suggests it. Additionally, I

                     would like to see the argument and supporting evidence against his

                     theory. Obviously, he believes that the mainstream theory does this

                     constantly in the real world, so he need not show the opposite side.

                     However, I was left wondering what studies and success stories the

                     behaviorists might pull out to prove his theory wrong.

 

                     Overall, I believe that each teacher needs to create an individual

                     learning environment in his or her classroom. Creating a "perfect old"

                     for all successful teachers will lead to cookie-cutter teaching. The

                     diversity of American teaching should be as diverse as American

                     society. Teachers need to sort through the various theories and beliefs,

                     and pick out those which best suite their style and ability of teaching.

 

 

Page 5

                     No matter how revolutionary and possibly effective Mr. Kohn's

                     theories might be, some teachers may simply fail when trying to

                     implement them. This does not make them bad teachers, only people

                     with different beliefs on what education is and how to effectively relate

                     learning to students. I, however, hope to find a way to implement Mr.

                     Kohn's ideas in my classroom, because I think that some of them might

                     help me move my students from empty minds to fill with knowledge

                     into excited and active learners. --This text refers to the Paperback

                     edition.

 

                    

Alfie Kohn writes and speaks widely on human behavior, education,

                     and social theory. His first book, No Contest: the Case Against

                     Competition, is regarded as the definitive critique of competition. He is

                     also the author of The Brighter Side of Human Nature: Altruism and

                     Empathy in Everyday Life (1990) as well as dozens of articles in

                     academic journals and popular magazines, including the New York

                     Times, the Atlantic Monthly, the Journal of Education, the Nation, and

                     the Harvard Business Review. A former teacher, he lectures and

                     conducts workshops for educators, parents, managers, and researchers

                     across the country and abroad. Kohn was educated at Brown

                     University and the University of Chicago, and lives in Cambridge,

                     Massachusetts.