“V. The Consideration of the Divine Unity
Through Its Primary Name Which is Being” by Bonaventure
In the first few paragraphs
of this chapter (§§1-6), Bonaventure presents a series of arguments that, if
you push your knowledge of reality back to its fundamental constituents, you will
discover that “above” your mind is an eternal light, which we can come to
understand is infinite being, the existence of which is necessary. In effect, Bonaventure argues that we have
an implicit or tacit awareness of the divine, in light of which all our
understanding of finite being takes place.
Even though we do not normally notice it, in other words, the reality of
God is always present to our consciousness.
[Is there a similarity here to anything we have read earlier?]
How are we to understand this
“infinite being” whose light we can glimpse “above” our minds? When ordinary believers consider what “God”
is, they often express their understanding in straightforward language derived
from everyday experience (e.g., God is a most powerful thing “out there” who
got the world going and now watches over it and, perhaps, views it as a moral
judge) or from biblical imagery (e.g., God is a mighty king sitting on his
heavenly throne [Isaiah] or God is a wise old man with flowing white beard
[Ezekiel]). In the closing paragraphs
of this chapter (§§7-8), Bonaventure attempts to assist his readers on their
“journeys” by exploring a series of contrasting claims that are to be made of
God conceived as infinite being. The
purpose of these contrasts, I would suggest, is to get us to see how even terms
used appropriately of God as infinite being are quite limited and must be used
carefully in relationship to each other.
He is offering us a reflective intellectual “exercise” in the
appreciation of something like a “grammar” of symbolic or analogical
language. Take any two of these
contrasts (e.g., absolute being is one and omnifarious or most actual and
changeless) and try to explore how your own understanding of what absolute
being might be like is challenged, overturned, or in some other way compelled
to “advance” along an intellectual journey.